ABSTRACT
The general objective of the study is to examine
export strategies and its effects on the agro processing industry of Ghana. The
study adopted a descriptive and exploratory research designs. Purposive and
convenience sampling technique were used to select the managers and junior
staff respectively. Structured questionnaire was administered to 50
respondents. Data were analysed with the aid of SPSS. The study discovered that
the type of export strategy pursues by the agro processing companies can to a
very high extent influence their performance. The study had again revealed that
a unit change in export strategy would bring 0.589 (59.8%) in organizational
performance. The R square result above implies that the independent variable
has 85.4% influences on organizational performance. Meaning that export
strategy has strong effect on organizational performance. The study
conclude that company reputation, importers distribution network, personal
contact with overseas distributors and export marketing knowledge, together
with these production quality and systems quality management, quality assurance
processes and others expertise were available in their firms give value to the
firms to effectively compete in the export business therefore must be
tactically looked at. Furthermore, the long years of experience in business
management and agro-oil exporting by majority of the workers puts the companies
at a great advantage because the more an employee stays in an organization, the
more skilled and professional he becomes. The study had discovered that export
strategies adopted by the agro processing companies within the Brong Ahafo
Ashanti Regions are positively affecting their performance. It is therefore
recommended that the current strategies must be improved to sustain performance
of the companies. These can be done through adoption of quality management
principles and strategic management practices. The scope of the study, time
frame and financial recourses were the major limitations of the study.
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0 Introduction
The general introduction of the study is presented in this
chapter. Specifically, the chapter encompasses the following; study background,
statement of the problem, general objective, specific objectives, research
questions, justification of the study, scope of the study, and organization of
the project. It serves the foundation from which all the other chapters of the
study are built.
1.1 Background of the study
Internationalization is the process of increasing the
accumulation of knowledge in markets and institutions abroad. It has been
observed that firms start the internationalization process by exporting
products to culturally similar countries. However, other researchers argue that
the longer a firm waits to initiate international activities, the more
difficult it will be to grow internationally (Sharma and Blomstermo, 2003).
Internationalization can be perceived as a part of the
ongoing strategy process of most business firms. The main differences between
internationalization and other types of strategy processes are as follows:
first, when products, services or resources are to be transferred across
national boundaries, the firm has to select the country where or with whom the
transactions should be performed. Secondly, the firm has to select the international
exchange transaction modality, i.e. a foreign market entry strategy (Andersen
and Buvik 2002).
Entry strategy includes the various forms of approaches and
procedure and methods used by a company to start doing business in a foreign
country (Shama, 2000). Entry strategy is an institutional arrangement that
makes possible the entry of firm’s products, technology, human skills,
management, or other resources into a foreign country (Karkkainen, 2005). There
are number of available marketing strategies that are available to prospective
companies who wish to enter into the international arena. There is the need to
distinguish between equity and non-equity modes when considering market entry.
The Equity node implies a situation where the firms take some
ownership degree of the market organization. These include wholly owned
subsidiaries and joint venture. The non-equity includes; ownership and often
times contractual agreements such as franchising and licensing. Some Authors also
involve the possibility of combining the two (Wilkinson and Nguyen, 2003).
There are several ways to expand internationally; these have
been categorized into four main strategy. These come in different forms from
the very high risk strategies to the lowest risk strategy. According to Caves
(1982) the following are the four most basic ways to arrange the strategies
from the highest to the lowest identified four basic ways to expand
internationally. These are; exporting, licensing and franchising, strategic
partnership and wholly owned. In a related study the authors stated that there
are six basic approaches into entering a new global market. These were outlined
as follows; exporting/importing, licensing and franchising, joint venture,
consortia partially – owned and wholly owned subsidiary (Cateora and Graham,
2002)
The decision to enter into relatively new market depends on
the perceived risk. The selection of a particularly entry strategy is also
influenced by how the individual corporate entities perceived the risk. Two
companies many consider two different entry strategy towards the same country.
Whereas others may adopt different strategies to enter into different countries
All these suggest that the drive to enter into new market is
relative and dynamic either than a static affair (Cateora and Graham, 2002).
Other study also suggests that the initial classification of new market entry
can be grouped into two. Namely; the location of the manufacturing facilities
and the percentage of ownership that a firms desire in foreign markets.
Many research works have reported on the motives behind
internationalization among companies. Although different Authors have reported
different findings, majority seems to revolve around the following: global
reputation, the prospect of long term growth and development, profitability
drive and enjoying an economy of scale. Others have also reported the following
as the main motive behind the drive: saturation of the local market, internal
competition, weak government policy and support among others. Literature review
had established that some of these factors or combinations of all are usually
considered when deciding to enter international market. But individual’s
choices are usually influenced by different factors (Cateora and Graham 2002).
However, the global market is not without a challenge. The
following are normal practices in the international market. The ever increasing
dynamics, intense competition, uncertain unreliable market conditions, the
rapid change in technology, short project life cycle among others.
The financial requirement and the managerial skills needed to
succeed have always been a serious challenged for the under developed world.
Commercialization is therefore a huge burden for the new entrants. Meanwhile
literature suggests that, the success in the international arena depends on the
product or service launch. Hence commercialization is a key determinant of
success but also comes with financial burden (Pinto et al., 2007).
Although several studies have been conducted on export
strategies little is known in terms of specific sectors. The previous had over
focused on multi sector studies. Despite the role and importance of
agro-processed export items in export leap strategy and economic, social and
cultural development plans in the country, little study has been conducted in
this domain. Majority of studies are done at the macro level that focuses on
the government role in export. Few researches in country have been on micro
level that focuses on company’s level. This present study, concentrates on
export strategies, because one of the critical decisions in the
internationalization process is the choice of an entry strategy (Quer-Claver
and Andreu, 2007).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The outcome of globalization and internationalization have
resulted in the sprang of competitions and complex decisions in the world
today. The decision to enter into other market has been very wide and well
known. The ability to select the most appropriate export strategy is considered
as vital step towards the internationalization drive. The most common forms of
entry strategies include; export, import, partnership, acquisition, licensing
and franchising. In the under developed world such decisions usually take long
time to conclude due to inadequate fianace and limited technological know-how.
In Ghana various governments and heads of state have
formulated number of policies all geared towards agricultural sector
development however little in seen and known when it comes to
internationalization of agro processed projects. The trend and preparation of
agro processing sector in Ghana have not been consistent in past. Different
approaches have been adopted by different companies but expected impacts are
yet to be felt.
These challenges are usually attributed to financial
requirement, low motivation, weak leadership, global competitions and taxation.
These to a greater extent have discouraged other corporate entities from
participating internationally. From the on-going the present study was
conducted to address the issue and pose questions such as types of export
strategies, benefits of exporting, challenges among others.
For more Marketing Projects Click here
===================================================================Item Type: Ghanaian Topic | Size: 65 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
===================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.