TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
Table of contents
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Statement of Research Problem
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Research Questions
1.5 Research Assumptions
1.6 Significance of the study
1.7 Scope and Limitation of the Study
1.8 Theoretical Framework
1.9 Research Methodology
1.10 Literature Review
1.11 Party Switching: A Conceptual Framework
1.12 Organisation of Chapters
References
CHAPTER TWO
2.1 Historical Evolution of Party Switching in Nigeria
2.1.1 The Colonial Experience
2.1.2 Party Switching in the First Republic
2.1.3 Party Switching in the Second Republic
2.1.4 Party Switching in the Third Republic
2.1.5 Party Switching in the Fourth Republic
References
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Dynamics of Party Switching in Nigeria
3.3 Factors that Promotes Party Switching in Nigeria
3.4 Implications of Party Switching for Democratic Consolidation
References
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 Summary
4.2 Conclusion
4.3 Recommendations
Bibliography
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Party switching or defection has assumed a preposterous dimension since
Nigeria returned to democratic governance in 1999. Defection has indeed
become a routine and part and parcel of political flesh in Nigeria. The spate of
party defection has not only threatened the country’s fledgling democracy, but
has also rubbished its underlying philosophies. It has further resulted into gross
and acute democratic instability in which the country is currently enmeshed. In
short, party switching in Nigeria constitutes one of the strong currents of
reversal that the country is contending with. The nation’s newspapers are
always inundated with reports on party switchers and how they are celebrated at
the state Houses of Assembly and the National Assemblies. Party switching
aptly described as “political prostitution” is fast becoming the hallmark of
Nigeria’s democracy.
In part, because the political act of changing parties goes by so many different terms, studies of party switching are difficult to track down and are yet to acquire status as a subfield in party politics (Janada, 2009). Despite this, Desposato (2006: 62-63) has pointed out the benefits of studying party switching:
Apart from the benefits of studying party switching, researchers have demonstrated kin interest in the factors that precipitate defection and the impact of defection on the stability and consolidation of democracy. Other questions that really bogged the minds of researchers are whether defection is democratic, undemocratic or anti-democratic and the workability or effectiveness of anti-defection laws in curbing party switching and its attendant negative consequences.
Traditionally, according to McElroy (2003), party switching is generally viewed as undemocratic behaviour or an “aberration or an indicator of a weak, ill-informed party system, a phenomenon associated with newly emerging democracies or unstable one.
However, the general view or reason for switching seems to suggest an autocratic trend and growing tendency towards a one party system in Nigeria. As a result, the aim of this study is not only to come up with an explanatory framework on party switching in Nigeria, but most importantly to critically analyze and proffer workable solutions to the problems of party switching which has become an increasingly permanent feature in the Nigerian democratic experience......
================================================================
Item Type: Project Material | Size: 43 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.