TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
Abstract
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background of Study
1.2 Statement of the problem
1.3 Purpose of the study
1.4 Significance of the study
1.5 Research Questions
1.6 Scope of the study
1.7 Limitation of the study
1.8 Definition of terms
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Historical Background
2.2 Character of the leadership
2.3 Structure of military government
2.4 Achievement of military government
2.5 Reason for military intervention
2.6 Process of return to civil rule
2.7 Summary of literature review
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Research design and Methodology
3.1 Design of the study
3.2 Area of the study
3.3 Population of the study
3.4 Sample size and sampling techniques
3.5 Instrument for data collection
3.6 Reliability and Validation of instrument
3.7 Distribution and retrieval of the instrument
3.8 Method of data analysis
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Data Presentation and Analysis
4.1 Data Presentation
4.2 Data Analysis
4.3 Discussion/Analysis of findings
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Summary of finding, Conclusion and Recommendation
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendations
References
Appendix
Questionnaire
ABSTRACT
A cursory glance at the economic conditions of Nigeria will reveal that underdevelopment has persisted in spite of independence and abundant resources available in the contrary. The cardinal question is why has Nigeria not developed given years in independence and abundant human and material resources especially during Gowon through Babangida’s regime. This work examines underdevelopment in nigeria vis-à-vis political leaders focusing on Ibrahim Babangida’s administration. Considering the crucial position of leadership in any nation. The researcher persists that the problem of Nigeria underdevelopment cannot be understood, or development attained without a radical change in the parasitic and exploitative character of political leadership in Nigeria. The persistence of underdevelopment can be attribute to the character of Nigeria political leads. The solution of which is by implementation of different kind of underdevelopment, the researcher also focused on the Babangida’s administration. 210 which is 20% of total population of 240 copies was used. Data collected using questionnaire and the analysis of data was done by the use of simple percentage. The findings proved that Babangida’s administration were not properly motivated and understood the political leadership.
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
This work examines underdevelopment in Juxtaposi with political leadership focusing on general Ibrahim Babangida’s administration with a view to x-raying the impact of political leadership in the underdevelopment of Nigeria.
This project will be centered on two variable underdevelopment and political leadership, underdevelopment as used in this project does not imply absence of development but as uncomparative term as a means of comparing levels of development (Ofiong 1980:10). According to Aja Akpaura (1998:48) under-development means: a relative condition in which a society lacks autonomous capacity to control and mobilize socio-economic formation for a sustainable economic growth and development necessary to effect physical mental, material and technological fulfillment without....================================================================
Item Type: Project Material | Size: 73 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
