TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Background of the Study
1.1 Aim and Objectives
1.2 Significance of the Study
1.3 Scope and Limitation
1.4 Research Methodology
1.5 Definition of Terms
1.6 Conclusion
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
2.1 Semantics Defined
2.2 Theories in Semantics
2.2.1 Model Theoretic Semantics
2.2.2 Formal or Truth Conditional Semantics
2.2.3 Lexical and Conceptual Semantics
2.2.3.1 Lexical Semantics
2.2.4 Computational Semantics
2.3 Word Meaning
2.3.1 Synonymy
2.3.2 Antonymy
2.3.3 Polysemy
2.3.4 Homonyms
2.4 The Relationship between Sentences
2.4.1 Paraphrases
2.4.2 Entailment
2.4.3 Contradiction
2.4.4 Ambiguity
2.5 Semantics and Semiotics
2.6 Semantics and Meaning
2.6.1 Connotation
2.6.2 Denotation
2.6.3 Extension and Intention
2.7 Redundancy
2.8 Conclusion
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
3.1 Method of Data Collection
3.2 Method of Data Analysis
3.3 Conclusion
CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
4.1 Presentation and Analysis of Data
4.2 Data Analysis
4.3 Discussion of Findings
4.4 Conclusion
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Summary
5.3 Conclusion
Reference
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
This project is an attempt to study some of the semantic redundancies found in students' speech. This is with a view to identify some long observed peculiarities in the use of redundancy in the students' use of English.
In the context of language studies, semantics occupies the end continuum. Semantics is at the top level because it deals with communication and interpretation. The major problem is with the definition of the subject simply as the study of meaning. Meaning is the target/goal in language. In whatever we do, we try to get meaning. The challenge is trying to find the meaning of meaning itself
Ogden and Richard (1923) said the major problem in semantics is trying to control "what is meaning".
This project work is concerned with the repetitions made by students while speaking.
However, any issue raised here would be considerably discussed and illustrated with adequate examples. Thus the findings of this work will on the other hand add to the existing literature(s) on semantic redundancy as a localized contribution to knowledge.
1.1 AIM AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of this project is to identify and analyze the features of redundancy in the speech of students of the Department of Mathematics of the Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto.
The specific objectives of this project are to:
i. Determine the linguistic motivation for redundancy.
ii. Establish a clear demarcation between samples of data taken and their Standard English version.
1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The importance of clarity and correctness in communication cannot be over emphasized. Therefore, this work on semantic redundancy is desirable because it provides some insights into the prevalence of redundancy in the verbal interaction of the students selected as the subject of the project. More so, the findings of this work will not only contribute to the existing literature on semantic redundancy, but would help anyone who goes through this work to avoid tautology in their speech.
The researcher hopes this work will aid subsequent researchers in the related field/ topics and will be a body of knowledge in the field of scholarship as it will be a source for further research...
================================================================
Item Type: Project Material | Size: 43 pages | Chapters: 1-5
Format: MS Word | Delivery: Within 30Mins.
================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.